Sheridan School District Campus reports · 2025–26 letter grades
Seven campuses · independent analysis of public ADE data, not an official district publication
Sheridan School District · campus by campus

Seven reports, one district, five very different years

Each campus gets the same treatment: what the grade actually says, what moved it, what is working well enough to protect, and the one place attention belongs next. Numbers are from the state's own file; the judgments are analysis, and every one of them names the evidence it rests on.

District summary
B
502.76
+28.16 · 58th of 255 districts
3campuses up a letter
2campuses down
2held
How to read these

Three things that change what the numbers mean

  • The state rose about 5 points in every subject. A campus that gained 5 points of proficiency stood still. Percentile rank against comparable Arkansas schools is the lens that corrects for it, and it is quoted throughout.
  • Paired campuses share one score. P–2 buildings are graded on their 3–5 partner's tested grades, so East End Elementary and East End Intermediate carry identical numbers, as do the two Sheridan campuses. Those sections say plainly which building the number describes.
  • Growth and achievement are different scoreboards. Growth targets are set per student from prior scores, so a campus can raise proficiency and still lose growth points. Several here did exactly that.
  • Peer median means the middle score among Arkansas schools of the same type serving a low-income share within six points of that campus — the fairest comparison the public data allows.
Across all seven

Three patterns no single campus report shows

Method

Where every number came from

  • Source. Arkansas Department of Education campus records from My School Info, imported 17 September 2026, plus DESE's official 2026 letter grade file. Statewide percentiles and peer medians are computed across all 1,042 graded Arkansas schools.
  • Suppression. The state withholds any group below its minimum size, which is why some subgroup cells appear one year and vanish the next. Small groups also swing hard — a 20-point move in a group of 25 students is four children.
  • Reported poverty jumped district-wide by roughly 10 points in a single year, which looks like a reporting or eligibility change rather than a change in the community. Peer comparisons here use the reported figure; if it is inflated, the peer medians shown are slightly too easy on Sheridan.
  • Program detail is gone. The 2025 file named each campus's programs; 2026 replaced them with generic labels. Where this report says an intervention worked, it is reasoning from grade-level results, not from a program roster.

Campus view: every school, 2025 vs 2026 → Peer & position: Sheridan against 255 districts →